Thursday, December 11, 2014

Chapter I Continued. 

My mother’s family were the Barnwells. They played a very significant role in the history of South Carolina. Stephen Barnwell, a history professor at Northern Michigan University, wrote a book entitled The Story of an American Family which was published in 1969. It is out of copyright and in great demand to genealogists and historians. I am taking on the project of scanning portions of the book that apply to my branch of the Barnwells and posting it to this blog. The American story begins with my sixth great grandfather, Colonel John Barnwell. This post is the rest of the first chapter and should be read after the December 10 post. Enjoy!

Chapter I
Colonel John Barnwell, Continued

They left Charles Town in the dead of winter and traversed 200 miles of swamp and forest in snow, ice, and heavy rainfall. The Indians were impossible to control and deserted all along the route. It took eight days to go the seventy miles from the Pedee to the Cape Fear and two more days to cross the Cape Fear. By the end of January they found themselves in the midst of several Tuscarora forts on the upper Neuse without guides or supplies. Word of their approach had miscarried, but in any case, the government was unprepared to fulfil their promise of an army of white men, 1,500 bushels of corn and a supply of powder and bullets. Colonel Barnwell marched on anyway, thundering at the incompetence of the local officials and the shortsightedness of the Virginians.

Routes of Colonel John Barnwell, Colonel James Moore, Colonel Maurice Moore into North Carolina


On January 29th the small army captured Fort Torhunta (or Narhantes) in half an hour of direct assault. The Tuscaroras were dismayed at the quick work made of one of their finest strongholds and retreated from several less­er fortifications leaving behind "a fine country full of provisions." This bounty did not last, however, and the persis­tent lack of provisions haunted the whole operation. Furthermore the sight of all the plunder in the fort was too great a temptation for many of his own Indians. In his report to the government in Charles Town, he noted:

"Our Indians, presently loading themselves with English plunder of which these towns are full, and running away from me, left nothing for the white men but their tired horses & their wounds to comfort them. . .the greatest part of our Indians are unwilling to proceed into unknown Country, where they may be hemd in by a numerous Enemy and not know how to extricate themselves; but my brave Yemassees told me they would go wherever I led them. They will live and die with me, and indeed I have that dependence on them that I would not refuse to give battle to the whole Nation of the Tuscaroras with them. The Enemy can't be less than 12 or 1400 men, which may be easily judged by their large settlements, but extremely cowardly if they have liberty to run. Our Indians outdo the Enemy very much either at bush or swamp but the Enemy are fleeter & has the advantage of knowing the Country." 18

Setting out again for Hancock's Fort, they took the village of Kenta where nine of the enemy were killed and two burned alive. The Commander deliberately was pursuing a policy of terror to frighten the enemy into surrendering. He led the march through five more villages and boasted that "every private man behaved himself so well it was Terror to our heathen friend to behold us; the word was Revenge, which we made good by the Execution we made of the Enemy." He reported destroying 374 houses in the first few days of the campaign.

After these initial victories the little army was bogged down by torrential rains. There were still no guides, and provisions again were running low. His Indians were more and more afraid to go on, but the Colonel felt he could not go back—"for the honour of Carolina I am always ready to sacrifice." When his scouts reported that Hancock's Fort "had some great guns, a great amount of powder, & 300 men," plus those who had fled from the destroyed vil­lages, he finally had to promise even his Yemassees not to attack until they had reinforcements. For this reason he turned northward toward Bath Town on the Pamlico. "I made such a march," he reported, "with 178 Indians & 25 white men, 20 odd whereof were wounded that to the immortal Glory of South Carolina has struck the Dominion of Virginia into amazement & wonder." On the way they burned another abandoned fort, beat off an attack of 50 or 60 Tuscaroras, and almost lost their commander.

As the Colonel noted in his report:

"I encamped all night, and rising at my usual hour which is daily since I had this charge on my hands, at 4 o'clock in ye morning, and at 5 I had just relieved the Centrys and sat at ye fire when ye Enemy poured a volley upon us, and I had reason to believe most of the Shott was directed at me for it made strange work with my things & several shott pluged the tree I leaned against. Our Centrys being very quick, fired at the same juncture, which was followed with 30 or 40 guns more . . . the Enemy was Fled without doing the least damage only the breaking of the stock of one gun wth a bullett."19

They arrived at Bath on the 10th "to ye incredible wonder and amazement of the poor distressed wretches, who expressed such extremity of mad joy that it drew tears from most of our men." He even proposed to the governor to settle the "300 widows and orphans that are here without provision or clothing and ill used" somewhere in South Carolina upon his return.

In camp about 15 miles above the town, they were joined by 67 North Carolinians without any ammunition, and a search of the Pamlico garrisons produced no more than ten rounds for each man. Unprepared as they were, it was necessary to move on to find food. "I waited so long for bread," reported the Colonel, "until half of the men fell sick and willing to preserve the health of the rest, I proceeded to get that of the Enemy's which was delayed by my friends." He now had 94 colonists and 148 Indians with him.

The torrential rains made it rough going, but some food was found in abandoned towns, and they learned some­thing of Hancock's Fort from a captive. Reaching the Neuse on March 4th, they crossed on rafts under fire fromseveral Tuscaroras. The South Carolinians took the lead because they alone would. "I could not prevail with one of this country cowardly crew to venture, which was a presage of what followed," Barnwell wrote. They reached the fort the next day to find it not only well built but excellently positioned.

The Colonel decided to take it by assault, "hoping to finish the war by this stroke, where now all the principal murderers were in a pen." He ordered fascines made, bundles of sticks tied together to serve as shields.

In his words:

"When we got within 10 or 12 yards of the Fort, the enemy made a terrible fire on us without the least damage in the world, but this country base, cowardly people, hearing the Shott strike the Fashines, threw both them & their arms away & ran for life, wch not only left themselves exposed but also those that went under their shelter: this encouraged the enemy to renew the firing, who deservedly shott sevIl of them in their backs. In the meantime my brave South Carolina men & 23 of this country undauntedly kept their order. I ordered them to keep their stations until I brought up the runaways. Butt all my endeavour was in vain, tho' I mauled sevIl wth my cutlass, and as soon as they saw me running towards them they would scamper into the swamp that was hard by. I, seeing the confusion & being afraid that the number that drew the enemy's fire was insufficient to come at the Fort by assault, I ordered a retreat which was gravely man­aged, for every man got Fashine on his back and of my own number I had but one wounded; the most of them had 10 or more shott in his Fashine, but the runaways there was 1 killed & 18 wounded and of the 23 that stood by my men there were 3 killed & 2 wounded, in all 4 killed and 20 wounded. It rained smartly during the attempt, wch proved a great hindrance."20

The Colonel was unable to get a second attack out of his men: "in vain for I could get but 16 with my own men, who never refused me anything I putt them upon." The next morning, after the wounded were evacuated, he returned to the attack:

"As soon as I returned to the camp I ordered wooden spades to be made & more Fashines & poles got ready, and in the dark of the evening I crept on my belly within 30 yards of the Fort & perceived a curious plan to make a breastwork, that had more command of the enemy's canoes & water than they had them­selves. To work I went & by morning had a re-intrenchment that held 50 men. In doing this I had 2 of my own brisk men wounded.

7th (March) The enemy being terrified at our near approach, began to quit the Fort, but my men fired so hard at ye canoes that obliged them to return. I immediately ordered a party over the River, and so blocked up the Fort on all sides, then the enemy when they wanted water would send to the bank one of the English captives to fetch it, our men called to them to have patience, for by next morning they should be delivered, at which the enraged desperate enemy began to torture them and in our hearing put to death a girle of 8 years of Mr. Taylors, upon this the relations of the other captives, came crying & beging of me to have compassion of the innocents, wch was renewed by Cryes & lamentations of the Captives being about 35 or 40 yards of them, at last I was prevailed upon to call to the enemy, who sent Mrs. Perce to me to treat about their delivery, she having 5 children within, wch ye enemy refused on any terms to do but on conditions I would raised the siege, otherwise they would put all to death and fight to the last man & beat us off.

After an hours consideration, having consulted all the officers, upon this I with two more went up to the Fort gates to speak with the head man who dare not come out to me; I preceived two reintrenchments within the Fort & perceived a great number of men. I ordered one of my men to go in but they would not let him, pleading he might have pocket pistols, I perceived ye head man & others to tremble exceedingly. I found that in case I broke in, I should have hard work against a parcel of desperate villains who would do all the mischief they could before their death. I knew I had not 30 men I could entirely depend upon, which if some of them (were) killed or wounded the rest of them would leave me in the lurch. Ammunition was so scarce with the North Carolina men, that some of them had not above 4 charges. I considered that if the place was relieved by the upper towns the enemy bragged of as much as of the assistance of the senicas, most of my men would run away, & it would be 2 nights more before I could penetrate the Fort for want of spades & Hoes, the ground being so rooty our wooden tools worked but slowly. And lastly I had more wounded men than I knew how to take care of, and if the number should increase upon meeting a repulse I should be forced to leave them to the mercy of ye most barbarous enemy. all wch considerations obliged me to agree."21

Under the agreement, twelve captives were to be released immediately with two canoes to carry them to safety.There was to be a truce for twelve days after which the Tuscaroras were to deliver the remaining 22 white and 24 Negro captives to Batchelor's Creek some six miles from New Bern. The chief of the Tuscaroras was to come with them to discuss the terms of the peace treaty.

Colonel Barnwell was unable to meet Hancock on the agreed date because he and most of his men were ill in New Bern. He put the blame on "the wilful neglect, designs & controversies of the government, who starved us here lest we should get provisions to enable us to depart their ungrateful service" He sent Captain Louis Mitchell, "a Swiss brave gentleman, " to go in his place, but the Indians failed to appear.

When he had recovered enough to mount his horse again, the Colonel ordered a reconnaissance to discover "whether the enemy maintained their Fort." He took with him only 15 white men and 30 Indians because he had provisions for only that number, but he also brought drums and trumpets to give the impression of a larger force.

They discovered that Hancock had not only maintained his fort, but enlarged it to include the Colonel's old breastwork. Hearing them approach,  the Tuscaroras raised the war cry, and Barnwell replied with his drums and trumpets and a bold sally to within 300 yards of the fort. The ruse was successful. Several of the enemy dropped their corn and fled. But he realized that he could do nothing more iwth his small troop and withdrew to a point seven miles below the fort, to the junction of the Cotechney Creek and the Neuse where he found a place "so naturally fortified that with little Labour 50 men could keep off 5000 men." "It is a very charming place, " he wrote and sent to New Bern for tools and boats. He built several huts and adequate fortifications, which he called Fort Barnwell, and then sent for his Indians who were "dispersed all over the county to subsist the better."

On April 1st, word came from Governor Hyde that Colonel Boyd and seventy men with provisions were on their way from New Bern with assurances that henceforth there would be no more reason to complain.  Barnwell then sent out a call for every able bodied man along the Neuse. Among the reinforcements were ten gallons of rum, two casks of cider and one cask of wine. He also received some cannon: "2 three-pounders, 2 patteraros, 7 Grandado shells, 23 Great Shott but hardly enough powder for 10 discharges." His greatest problem, apart from the perpetual food shortage, was insubordination among the new recruits "which putt me," he said, "in such a passion at all kinds of ill usages since I came here that I ordered on of their majors to be tyed neck and heels & kept him so, and whenever I heard a saucy word from any of them I immediately cutt him, for without this they are the most impertinent, imperious, cowardly, Blockheads that ever God created."

Within a week everything was ready to march again. On the night of the 7th, 154 white men and 128 Indians moved out of Fort Barnwell for Hancock's Town. By daybreak they  had it surrounded and blockaded, "We were there before ye enemy was aware of us," reported the Colonel.This siege lasted ten days "by which time," he wrote, "we gained ye ditch & sevll times fired ye pallisades wch ye enemy like desperate villains defend at an amazing rate. This seige for variety of action, salleys, attempts to be relieved from without, can't, I  believe be paralleled agst Indians." But the lack of food brought the attack to a standstill: ". . . the 15 foot," he wrote, "cost us so much time untill I was, thro' extreme famine, obliged to harken a capitulation for the surrendering thereof upon articles wch leaves above 100 murderers unpunished." The enemy, he later discovered, had been supplied with "400 buckskins worth of ammunition" from Virginia, but the deciding factor was food. He said if only he had had four more days' rations, they could have made "a glorious end of the War."  They lost six white men killed and 35 wounded, one Indian killed and one wounded.

Under the new treaty, all the captives were to be released, those in the Town immediately and the rest in ten days at Fort Barnwell, Hancock and three "notorious murderers" were to be surrendered plus all horses, skins, and plunder, three hostages (two brothers of the Tuscarora chief and the chief of the allied Coree tribe), and all the corn in the town. The Tuscaroras were to pay an annual tribute to the government, to restrict their planting area, and to vacate all the land between the Neuse and the Cape Fear.

But not all the terms were fulfilled. Twenty-three children and two Negroes were released, but Hancock had fled to Virginia. His two sons and a brother of the Coree chief were delivered up. They agreed to restrict their planting and to pay the tribute, but most of the horses, skins, and plunder were gone. There was enough corn for forty Indians, and they were sent home.

With this done, the gates of the fort were torn down, and Colonel Barnwell "drew the whole body up before the breach & marched then unto ye Fort. 2 Trumpets, 2 Drumms, South Carolina Standard, Yemassee & Apalatchka, Col. Boyd, Coll. Mitchell, Major Mackay, Major Cole, myself, gentlemen volunteers 2 x 2, South Carolina men 2 x 2, ye Yemassee Capts 2 x 2." Inside the fort, the colors were raised, the guns fired, and Colonel Barnwell made "a short, sharp speech." The Tuscaroras hid their arms and prostrated themselves before the victors. The Colonel was urged to massacre them on the spot, but he refused: "In truth," he said, "they were murderers, but if our Indians found that there could be no dependence in our promises, it might prove of ill-consequences." 22

The victorious army returned to Fort Barnwell where the Colonel made his report to Governor Gibbes asking for more corn for his Yemassees who had supported him when "all others left him in his greatest extremity." Reluctant to leave any of the wounded behind, he remained in North Carolina until July. On  his return  he was thanked by the assembly and, in time, was dubbed by an admiring posterity "Tuscarora Jack."

Some of his Indians had long been out of control, and, now, hungry and disappointed at the lack of plunder and scalps, they violated the treaty by attacking small parties of Tuscaroras which brought new reprisals on the colonists by the Tuscaroras. By August North Carolina was again pleading for aid. They blamed their failure to support the first expedition on its commander, on the floods and then the drought, the lack of ammunition, and the attitude of the Virginians. In spite of their criticism of Barnwell, he would have received the command of the second expedition simply because "he was the most experienced Indian fighter in the province," but his wounds prevented it. "It is self-evident upon the character of Colonel Barnwell," says Milling, "that, although vilified in Foster's instructions (from North Carolina which were read in the assembly), he advised the committee appointed by the House that further aid be given and personally assisted in planning the second campaign." 23 With a larger and better prepared army, Colo­nel  James Moore, Jr. was able to defeat a still powerful Tuscarora nation. Most of the Tuscaroras abandoned North Carolina and migrated to northern New York to become the sixth nation of the Long House of the Iroquois.

Two years later it was South Carolina's turn to reap the rewards of their exploitive relations with the Indians. This attack came literally at the back door of the family—from the neighboring and once friendly Yemassees. They were, however, only the advance guard of what turned out to be "a far-reaching revolt against the Carolina trading regime," involving all the tribes who had had any trading relations with the Charles Town merchants—Creeks, Choctaws, Catawbas, Yemassees as well as many smaller tribes. It was what Nairne had been warning the colony about for many years.

The Indian Act of 1707 had been largely frustrated by Governor Johnson and the merchants, and when Nairne was replaced by John Wright as Indian agent in June 1708, the whole system of regulation broke down under Wright's mismanagement.

The Yemassees struck on Good Friday, April 15, 1715 at Pocotaligo Town. Among their initial victims was Nairne himself who was tortured to death over several days. Only two or three of the settlers escaped; one of them swam the river to Colonel Barnwell's plantation on the northern end of Port Royal Island and gave the alarm to the unsuspecting planters. About 300 of them with their families crowded onto a ship which had been seized for smug­gling and providentially was lying at anchor in the harbor. Among them was Tuscarora Jack's ten year old son Nathaniel who had been rescued from the plantation house minutes before the Indians arrived. St. Bartholomew's Parish to the north was less fortunate because no alarm was given there, but the parishes beyond there received warning in time. By then the other tribes had joined the war and threatened not only the whole of Carolina but, if the conspiracy was allowed to spread to all the tribes, all the English settlements even up to New England.

"That South Carolina escaped complete ruin," Crane concludes, "was due to the energy of a gallant governor, to the skill of seasoned Indian fighters who commanded her militia, to assistance in arms and men from neighboring provinces, and to the conversion of the Cherokees at a critical moment to peace and friendly assistance." 24 Governor Craven proclaimed martial law and organized the forces of the colony under General James Moore, Jr. Colonel John Barnwell and Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Mackay, companions-in-arms on the Neuse, were sent to recap­ture the Yemassee capital at Pocotaligo after securing Port Royal Island. The Governor with 250 militia and settle­ment Indians marched south to join Barnwell and Mackay, and together they drove the Yemassees into Florida where they found protection under the Spaniards near St. Augustine. But the Creeks and others were still on the warpath. It was not until the Cherokees signed a treaty with the colony in January 1716 that the tide of battle defi­nitely turned. But peace, and an uneasy one at that, did not return until the end of 1717. Altogether over 400 colo­nists were killed and the growth of the colony was set back several years.

The task of reconstruction began with the re-organization of the Indian trade system by an Act of the Assembly in June 1716. This Act created a public corporation of five commissioners who were given complete control over trade with the Indians. Tuscarora Jack was a member of the first board along with George Logan, Ralph Izard, Charles  Hill, and James Moore.25 With minor exceptions he was in regular attendance at their meetings of which there were over 100 during the first year. Each commissioner was paid a salary of £150 a year. John was also given charge of their public store house in Charles Town from March to December 1717 for which he was paid an additional £150 out of the profits of the trade. The new system reflected the victory of the planters, concerned with preventing an­other uprising, over the merchants. It was an interesting experiment in what was virtually a state monopoly, and naturally the merchants screamed until they got a modified Act in 1717, but the planters remained in control of the regulatory system, and the worst abuses were eliminated.

Tuscarora Jack had other duties during the reconstruction besides the Indian Commission. A member of the assembly from 1717 to 1719, he was put in charge of the southern defense of the colony. A fort was built on Port Royal Island in March 1716 which was to serve as the base for the two scout boats of the "provincial navy." The garrison was divided into two crews, one to remain at the fort, the other to patrol the inland passage between Port Royal and the Atlamaha river in Georgia. He directed all their operations between the Stono and St. Augustine, retrieving runaway slaves, keeping watch on the Spaniards and Indians, and preparing maps of the region.

It is interesting to note that the garrison at Port Royal was reinforced at the time of the Yemassee war with a body of Tuscaroras who had not gone to New York. What irony that they should be brought down to fight against the Yemassees and given vacated Yemassee land. They were placed under the protection of their erstwhile enemy, John Barnwell, who directed all their trading with the merchants. Occasionally he used them to stop the persistent raiding of the Yemassees from Florida. Early in 1719 he personally undertook a peaceful mission to the Yemassees to win them back from the Spaniards but with no success. When a party of Yemassees penetrated into Granville county, killed several settlers, and took others into slavery, he decided to stop this once for all. In September he promoted an expedition against the Yemassees and Spaniards at St. Augustine which he described in his report to the governor as "performed by 50 Indians, Melvin, a Whiteman & Musgrove, & Griffin half-breed or Mustees under ye Leading of Oweeka, a Creek Indian their Generall. Wettly, his Second, a Palachucola Indian."26 The expedition, which left Port Royal in seven canoes on September 28th included local Coosas and some Tuscaroras of the local garrison in one of the scout boats. Upon returning a month later to report their mission accomplished, Colonel Barnwell wrote to the governor: "I congratulate wth yr Honr this dawning of quietness to our poor Southern parts," but he was a little premature. Peace was not to come for many years. In June 1720 another Yemassee raiding party struck St. Helena's Island, killing one planter, capturing a white man and 12 Negro slaves.

One of the most important consequences of the Yemassee War was to reveal more clearly than ever the real inade­quacies of proprietary government. For many years the colonists had recognized that their interests were not the same as those of the Lords Proprietors, but it was the inability of the Proprietors to understand and give assistance at the time of the war and during the period of reconstruction which provoked the colony to action. By 1719 the wealthiest and most influential men in the colony were agreed to demand an end to proprietary rule and the es­tablishment of direct royal government. The assembly which met in December of that year converted itself into a convention, and the last proprietary governor, Robert Johnson, seeing the futility of resistance, resigned.

To present their case before the government in London, the assembly chose Colonel Barnwell. As Verner Crane has said, they could not have made a better choice:

"As a veteran of Queen Anne's War, of the Tuscarora War, and of the Indian rising of 1715, John Barnwell had first-hand knowledge of the Indian and Spanish frontiers from Virginia to the neck of Florida, moreover as the greatest planter of the Port Royal district, he had a direct interest in safeguarding the har-rassed southern border. His career in provincial office gave him standing as a colonial expert which the average agent, chosen from the merchant group in London, seldom possessed." 27

Colonel Barnwell sailed from Charles Town in March 1720 and arrived in London at the height of the land specu­lation craze known as the South Sea Bubble. Upon his arrival he wrote a letter to Sir Robert Montgomery, the chief promoter of the Azilia Company, a scheme to develop the land between the Savannah and the Altamaha rivers, commending his project and expanding on the beauties of the region. His letter was given wide circulation in a pamphlet called "A Description of the Golden Islands," and his advice was eagerly sought, not only by the Board of Trade, the Privy Council and the President of the Council Lord Townshend, but also by hordes of private investors. He could be seen in the Carolina Coffee House at least once a day or at the home of Francis Nicholson who was to become South Carolina's first royal governor.
"Mapp of Beaufort in South Carolina 1721"

Barnwell had two official tasks. The first was to persuade the government to accept the revolution in Charles  Town, and the second was to present the case for a better southern defense system. His first assignment was relative­ly easy to accomplish. His way had been prepared by persistent anti-proprietary propaganda for many years, and now a flood of letters and memorials arrived from Carolina showing the great popularity of the change. His first interview with the Board of Trade on August 11th produced an immediate order taking the government of South Carolina into the King's hands.

"The second purpose of Barnwell's mission," writes Crane, "was to convert the colonial authorities to a vigorous program of frontier defense in the South. Since the death of Captain Nairne no Carolinian, perhaps no American, was better qualified than this Beaufort planter and veteran of numerous Indian campaigns to assist the Board of Trade in laying the groundwork of an Imperial western policy. Though Barnwell based his program upon the Indian system of South Carolina, it was conceived on a truly conti­nental scale; its object was to offset the rapid expansion of French influence all along the back of the En­glish seaboard colonies. The notable reports of the Board of Trade upon South Carolina in 1720 almost literaily reproduced Barnwell's suggestions. His ideas were again incorporated, with those of James Logan, in the great representation upon the state of the colonies of September 8, 1721. With these documents, issuing from Whitehall in 1720-21, British western policy may be said to begin." 28

Colonel Barnwell proposed building a series of forts surrounded by settlement in imitation of the French policy as a means of opposing French encirclement from New Orleans to Quebec. He suggested six strategic locations on the southern frontier where such forts ought to be constructed. Port Royal was to become a port of entry and the supply point for the entire southern frontier. His proposal assumed the jurisdiction of South Carolina to cover all the Indian territory from the Cherokee land along the Tennessee to the Mississippi river and down to the gulf of Mexico. His plan was drawn up in detail for only the southern frontier, but it was applicable to the whole continent including the Bahamas, the maritime frontier.

The plan was endorsed by the Board of Trade and sent to the Lords Justices, but they were more conservative, more aware of the expense involved, and less imperialistic. They approved only "the proposals for the Altamaha garrison, for the allotment of lands for 'the new projected town' on the Altamaha, and for the Indian trade confer­ence (with Virginia to settle the problem jointly)." They urged the command of the Altamaha project be given to Barnwell "whose knowledge of the Country and Experience in matters of this Nature will highly conduce to the promoting a Settlement on this Frontier." Their recommendations were approved by the Privy Council and appropriate instructions were sent to the new royal governor.

Tuscarora Jack's discussions with the Board of Trade continued through November, and he did not return to Carolina for another six months. It would be i nteresting to know whether he returned to Ireland to visit his family, but nothing is known of his activities during this interval. He was paid the enormous sum of Z1,000 from the general levy for his services in London.29

On May 22, 1721 H.M.S. Enterprise with Governor Nicholson, Colonel Barnwell, and the new royal garrison dropped anchor off Charles Town harbor. Within a week, John was appointed Justice of the Peace for Granville county, commander of the county militia including the Port Royal scout boats again, and commander of the expedi­tion to the Altamaha.30 He presented his plans for the expedition to the Council on June 7th. They asked him to write out his own commission and instructions which, with minor changes, were approved and signed on the 10th. He left immediately for Port Royal to begin preparations.31

Hampered by heavy rains, it took nearly three weeks before everything was ready. He had to rely mainly on his scout boat men who, he was afraid, had lost some of their discipline while he was in London. "These Scoutmen," he wrote, "are a wild idle people & continually Sotting if they can gett any Rum for Trust or money. Yet they are greatly usefull for such Expeditions as these if well & Tenderly managed, ffor as their Cheerful Imploy is to hunt the fforest or ffish. So there is Scarce One of Them but understands the Hoe, the Axe, the Saw, as well as their Gun and Oar." He persuaded twenty-six of them to go. He also tried to get six Creek Indians, but they fled just before sailing. He took one Creek and a Tuscarora, but six other Tuscaroras and several Edisto Indians he left behind because of the influence they might have on the Creeks. Preparations were finished by the 6th of July.
Colonel Barnwell's preliminary sketch of Fort King George 1721

"I furnished myself with all Such Necessarys as I wanted out of the King's store at Beaufort," he reported, "and took Everything belonging to Royal Scout, and putt them on Board the Sloop, the Whale Boat and my perriaugoe, which with that & ye provisions were deep loaded, and having hired one David Duvall & his It was "a 'planked house,' or gabled blockhouse, twenty-six feet square. There were three floors: a magazine floor, a gunfloor at six feet from the ground, with walls pierced for cannon and musketry, and above a 'jetting floor to clear the sides,' with more loopholes for small arms. High in the gable a lookout window command­ed a wide view of river and marsh and old Indian fields, and of St. Simon's Island to the east and southeast. On the land side of the blockhouse was defended by an earthen parapet, five to six feet high, with a bastion, and surrounding palisades and a moat. Another parapet of fascines fronted the river, and the palisades were continued along the marsh on the northeast. Within this irregular triangle, in a space measuring two hun­dred by three hundred feet, stood several palmetto-roofed huts and barracks." 32

Fort King George was the first permanent English penetration into Georgia. The royal garrison at Beaufort was stationed there until the fort burned down in January 1726. The weakness of the government in Charles Town delayed reconstruction until 1736 when General Oglethorpe changed the site to St. Simon's Island and there, with vastly superior resources, built Fort Frederica.

Tuscarora Jack was a leading member of the assembly again from 1721 until his death. He was appointed to the first Committee of Correspondance which served as a liason with the government in London. In 1724 he agreed to undertake a second mission to London when his health began to fail. Returning to Port Royal he made his will on May 4th and died early in June. On the 9th, Governor Nicholson wrote to the assembly:
"I am most cordially concerned for the Great Loss that His Majesty's Province in general and more parti­cularly that part to the Southward hath sustained by the death of the honorable Coll. Barnwell. I have my Self been an Eye and Ear Witness of the Great Services he did for this Country in Great Britain."33

His wife, Anne Berners, who tradition says was the sister of an English merchant living in Charles Town, had died before him leaving two sons and six daughters among whom his estate, amounting to over 6,500 acres, was divided.

"A Plan of King George's Fort at Allatamaha South Carolina"

Tuscarora Jack was buried in St. Helena's Churchyard on Port Royal Island directly behind the church. The apse was enlarged many years later, and so his grave is probably underneath the altar.

Their children:
Margaret Barnwell, b. Feb. 13, 1704; d. Aug. 18, 1750.
Nathaniel Barnwell, b. Mar. 13, 1705; d. Feb. 20, 1775. (My 5 greats grandfather)
Anne Barnwell, b. Aug. 7, 1707; d. Aug. 17, 1770.
Mary Barnwell.
Bridget Barnwell, d. Apr. 18, 1741.
Katherine Barnwell, b. Nov. 4, 1710; d. Oct. 7, 1740.
John Barnwell, b. Mar. 8, 1712; d. Oct. 5, 1782.
Elizabeth Barnwell, d. July 1748.

References


1 Joseph Walker Barnwell, "Barnwell of South Carolina," The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine (Jan. 1901), Vol. II, pp. 47-50 has the Harleston—Page correspondence.


2 Stephen Bull Barnwell, "The Barnewall Family during the 16th and 17th Centuries," The Irish Genealogist, Vol. 3, Nos. 5-8, 10-11 (1960-63; 1965-66), and "The Family of Barnewall (De Berneval) during the Middle Ages," ibid., No. 4 (1959), pp. 124-135.


3 S. B. Barnwell, op. cit., Vol. 3, No. 6 (1961), pp. 206-209.


4 Marion Eugene Sirmans, Colonial South Carolina. A Political History, 1663-1763 (Chapel Hill, 1966), p. 58. Wooden houses continued to be built, however.


5 Alexander Samuel Salley (ed.), Commissions and Instructions from the Lords Proprietors of Carolina to Public Officials of South Carolina. 1685-1715 (Columbia, 1916), p. 159.


6 J. W. Barnwell, op. cit., p. 47n.


7 A. S. Salley (ed.), Journal of the Commons House of Assembly, /707 (Columbia, 1940), p. 42.


8 J. W. Barnwell, op. cit., p. 47n.


9 A. S. Salley (ed.), Warrants for Lands in South Carolina, 1692-1711 (Columbia, 1915), pp. 196-7.


10 Sirmans, op. cit., p. 81.


11 Loc cit.


12 Jack P. Greene, The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689-1776 (Chapel Hill, 1963), p. 475.


13 Sirmans, op. cit., p. 104.


14 Edward McCrady, History of South Carolina under the Proprietary Government (New York, 1901), pp. 400-1.


15 Verner Winslow Crane, The Southern Frontier, 1670-1732 (Durham, N.C., 1929), p. 220.


16 William P. Cumming, The Southeast in Early Maps (chapel Hill, 1962, 2d ed.), p. 46.


17 Joseph W. Barnwell (ed.), "The Tuscarora Expedition. Letters of Colonel John Barnwell," SCHGM. Vol. IX (1908), pp. 28 54.


18 Ibid., pp. 33-34.


19 Ibid., p. 40.
20I Ibid., p. 44.


21 Ibid., pp. 45-46.


22 Ibid., p. 54.


23 Chapman James Milling, Red Carolinians (Chapel Hill, 1940), p. 128.


24 Crane, op. cit., p. 170.


25 William L. McDowell (ed.), Journals of the Commissioners of the Indian Trade 17/0-1718 (Columbia, 1955), passim.


26 Milling, op. cit. pp. 155-56.


27 Crane, op. cit., p. 228.


28 Ibid., p. 220.


29 Ella Lonn, The Colonial Agents of the Southern Colonies (Chapel Hill, 1945), pp. 280,308.


30 A. S. Salley (ed.), Journal of His Majesty's Colony for South Carolina May 29, 1721-June 10,1721 (Columbia, 1930), pp. 13-25.


31 J. W. Barnwell (ed.), "Fort King George. Journal of Col. John Barnwell (Tuscarora) in the Construction of the Fort on the Altamaha in 1721," SCHGM (1926), Vol. XXVII, No. 4, pp. 189-203.


32 Crane, op. cit., pp. 236-37.


33 Salley, op. cit.,JCHA,June 2-16,1724, p. 17.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

My mother’s family were the Barnwells. They played a very significant role in the history of South Carolina. Stephen Barnwell, a history professor at Northern Michigan University, wrote a book entitled The Story of an American Family which was published in 1969. It is out of copyright and in great demand to genealogists and historians. I am taking on the project of scanning portions of the book that apply to my branch of the Barnwells and posting it to this blog. The American story begins with my sixth great grandfather, Colonel John Barnwell. Enjoy!


Chapter I

Colonel John Barnwell


As the 18th century opened, a young Irishman of good family, "the son of a verry good gentleman and gentlewoeman," sailed from his native Dublin for Charles Town in the colony of Carolina "out of a humor to goe to travel but for no other Reasson." Thus was John Barnwell, the progenitor of the family, described by a family friend, Alder­man John Page of Dublin. Page might have said a good deal more, but was content merely to add that John had "extriordinary friends and Relashons" in the kingdom.1

Page could have said that the Barnewalls, as the name is usually spelled in Ireland, or de Berneval as it appeared in Normandy and throughout the Middle Ages, had settled in Dublin county at Drimnagh Castle some 500 years before. Here they flourished and spread into nearby county Meath and elsewhere in Ireland and England. For centu­ries they were loyal servants of the English Crown and were duly rewarded through ennoblement in three great branches: Barons of Trimlestown in 1461, Baronets of Crickston in 1623, and Viscounts of Kingsland and Barons of Turvey in 1646. John, indeed, had "extriordinary Relashons" in the kingdom. 2

In time the Barnewalls became as "Irish as the Irish themselves," and took part in the fight for Irish independence in the 17th century. With the failure of their cause, a steady stream of Irishmen, known to history as "the wild geese," took flight for continental armies and monasteries. John, instead, came to America.

His father, Matthew Barnewall, an alderman of Dublin in 1688, was a captain in King James' Irish Army and was killed in the siege of Derry on August 12, 1690. John's mother was Margaret Carberry, a daughter of Alderman John Carberry, and his grandfather, Richard Barnewall, had been an alderman in the 1630s and briefly in 1647, the Lord Mayor. Richard was a merchant, but he also held Archerstown, an estate in county Meath which had been granted to him for his loyalty during the Rebellion of 1641. Archerstown had belonged to a cadet branch of the Barnewalls of Crickston since the reign of Henry VII, but when they joined the Rebellion, as did most of the family, their lands were declared forfeit and given to Richard. This means almost certainly that he was a member of the same branch. At any rate, Archerstown was forfeited again, by Matthew, in 1690 for his loyalty to King James. Some of his heirs attempted to regain some of their lost rights, but John was not among them. He had sailed for the new world.3

When John Barnwell landed in Charles Town, he found a colony which had survived its early problems and was entering upon what promised to be a bright future. By 1700 there were 4,200 whites, largely British but also includ­ing a sizeable number of French Huguenots; 3,200 Negro slaves, and 800 Indian slaves. The colony had been faction ridden and, to the great disappointment of the Lords Proprietors, economically unprofitable from the moment the good ship Carolina with the original settlers dropped anchor in Charles Town harbor in April 1670. But during the half-decade before John arrived, the situation had changed dramatically. The mastery of rice culture by 1695 had given the colony a staple crop which insured its prosperity. The expansion of Indian trade started the first real pene­tration into the interior by Englishmen, and the firm and wise hand of Governor Archdale had achieved a measure of political harmony hitherto unknown.

The people of Charles Town were so confident of their destiny that they had begun making their city one of the finest in all the colonies. They were "building their homes along wide and well planned streets," lined with pines, cedars, and cypress trees. By 1700 wooden houses were forbidden within the city limits. The Anglican Missionary, Dr. Francis LeJau, after travelling through the West Indies and Virginia, believed that "for Gentility, politeness and a handsome way of living," Carolina exceeded anything he had seen.4 A public library had been opened and the ear­liest contributions to science and learning already made. 

John Barnwell was fortunate in soon finding some powerful friends. By February 1703 he was Clerk of the Gover­nor's Council and in August 1704 was promoted to Deputy Secretary of the Council, in which capacity he served as liason between the council and the assembly.5 His chief patrons were the Governor, Sir Nathaniel Johnson, and Chief Justice Nicholas Trott. Johnson, appointed governor in 1702, had come to Carolina in 1689 after a distin­guished career as a colonial official in the West Indies and became a wealthy planter at Silk Hope Plantation outside Charles Town. John's friendship with him was such that in March 1705 he named his elder son Nathaniel after him. His association with Trott was even closer. John Harleston, who had preceded Barnwell from Dublin by two years, wrote to Page that Trott "respected Barnwell very much," and was "like a Father to him," and "instructed him in his Places whareof he was very incapable." Trott invited his protege and wife to Harleston's wedding in April 1707 and "set him at table with the Governor & Capt. of a men-a-ware" then lying at anchor in the harbor. 6 Finally in June 1707 John was promoted to Comptroller of the Province.7
At this point John's career takes a dramatic and important turn. Harleston put it very bluntly in a letter to Page in March 1709:
" . . . he was one that flew in the face of the Governmt & headed a Mobb against the Chief Justice Mr. Nicholas Trott, who is my Perticuler Friend in Carolina; this Barnwell was Deputy Secretary & Clark of the Council!, which was pretty Considerable in Carolina, & threw this misdemeaner he was Turned out of all; I suppose his comeing in at present would not admitt him to live in Charles towne, which has maide him settle a Plant(ation) at Port Royall near a 100 miles from towne, and thare he lives on what he has Cot by the government horn he soe Groosly abused . . . This Barnwell had this Designe in his head some before but would not vent it till the Man of warr sail'd Lest they should stop his Proceedings. Barnwell would not have had soe many Rioters to assist him but by reason of this, which was that the Judge then had the Church of England Established by act of Assembly & sent home for Ministers & Devided Parrishes & paid them out of the publick which has made the Decenters his Enemies Ever since . . Judge Trott is now on his voyage to England in Persute of this Riot & has Latters of recomindation to the Arch-Bishop of London by the Clergye of the Church of England & by the best of all the Country of his uprightness, and allsoe had record maid by Coll. Wm Rhett & Coll. Risbe Justices of the Peace concerning this riot, which I would have you see."8

Colonel William Rhett


It has been impossible so far to determine precisely the date of John's protest demonstration and act of civil diso­bedience, but to understand why he did it, it is necessary to sketch in the background to the events of these years. In September 1703 John was ordered by the Council to prepare a map of Port Royal Sound where he soon began to develop a strong interest. In February and March 1705 he received grants for 1,400 acres of land on Port Royal and neighboring islands.9 Between September 1706 and February 1709, he received five more grants for a total of 3,414 acres in the four years. Among his new neighbors was a Scotsman, Thomas Nairne, described as "probably the ablest, and certainly the most admirable politician" of his day.10

Captain Thomas Nairne had owned a plantation on St. Helena's Island since 1698 and later acquired another one on the edge of the Yemassee Indian country on the mainland across the Coosaw river. Appointed agent to regulate trade with the Indians, he became deeply interested in the urgent matter of trade reform, and, as a sincere Anglican, was interested in the conversion of the Indians to Christianity. His views on frontier policy, the Indians, and trade reform soon "attracted some of the brightest young men of the colony: . John Barnwell, George Chicken, Tobias Fitch and William Bull (who had married Nairne's step-daughter). This group of men originated every constructive development in South Carolina Indian policy for the next generation." 11

To call the commercial intercourse between the Charles Town merchants and the Indians "trade" is almost a euphemism. The Indians were gradually debauched and then enslaved by debt. South Carolina was the only colony that was able to make Indian slavery pay. The merchants profitting by the system included some of the most power­ful men in the colony: Johnson, Trott, and Colonel Rhett. They found ready allies among the so-called Goose Creek men, a group of planter-merchants who had been one of the most divisive factions in the pre-Archdale era. The more prominent among them were James Moore, Robert Gibbes, and Ralph Izard.
The planters, particularly those in the southern part of the colony, were convinced that the existing system, or lack of it, would inevitably lead to an Indian revolt, which it did, and that the leadership of the colony was too interested financially in the status quo to do anything about it. They tended to come together under the leadership of Thomas Nairne.

The situation was complicated by the proposal for the establishment of the Church of England and the exclusion of dissenters from any part in the government. From its inception Carolina had been generally free of religious con­flict. The Anglican Church was dominant, but dissenters had been freely admitted into the colony and more than one governor had been of their persuasion. Of the 4,200 white persons the largest body were Anglicans (1,800), but the dissenters altogether numbered 2,000. The 400 Huguenots, despite their theological affinity with the dissenters, tended to support the Anglicans to whose Church they were gradually being converted anyway. Taking advantage of a sparsely attended assembly in March 1704, the High Church party, with their Huguenot allies, and led by John­son, Trott, Rhett, and the Goose Creek men, secured the passage of the Church Act which not only established the Church of England but also required communion in the Anglican Church a condition to any office in the colony. The dissenters naturally objected and sent John Ash and later Joseph Boone to London to lodge a protest with the Lords Proprietors.

It is possible that the Establishment men might have gotten away with it if the Anglicans had held together, but they were divided over several issues. The dissident Anglicans in Charles Town were led by old Colonel Stephen Bull until his death in 1707. He was the last survivor of the original leadership in the colony and had helped to lay out the city in 1670. The Stanyarnes and Elliotts, for their own reasons, could also be counted upon to align themselves with the opposition to the politico-religious machinations of the High Church party. The dissident Anglicans in the coun­try were led by Thomas Nairne who had several reasons for his opposition. He generally supported the assembly and the colonists against the Governor, Council, and Lords Proprietors, but in this case he was obviously struck by the fact that those who were most opposed to trade reform were the same men who were now trying to assure their permanent political ascendancy through the imposition of religious qualifications for office holding.

Where John Barnwell stood at that time is hard to say. He was an Anglican and had his children baptized and raised in the Church, but his association with Nairne and his growing interests in the Port Royal region were draw­ing him away from his early dependence on Johnson and Trott, and he is listed by Sirmans among the dissident Anglicans. However his position in the government continued to be secure until after the repeal of the Church Act in November 1706 and through April 1707 when Trott treated him so graciously at Harleston's wedding. The religious controversy began to wane, but the bitterness of it carried over into other issues, particularly trade reform.

The opposition under Nairne won the elections to the assembly in May 1707, and soon John found himself in the center of the conflict. The assembly met in June and began to fight with Governor Johnson over trade reform and the right to appoint the chief revenue officers in the province: the public receiver and the comptroller. Nairne attacked Trott's position in the council claiming it was illegal since he held a royal commission in another capacity. The governor countered by claiming the right to appoint the public receiver and the comptroller, a right which tradition ally belonged to the assembly. In fact in their annual tax bill, the assembly had nominated George Logan for pub­lic receiver and John Barnwell for comptroller.

John Barnwell's Map of Southern North America, circa 1772



Johnson's strategy worked for the moment. The attack on Trott and the trade reform bill were postponed until the dispute over the appointments was settled. It is interesting to note that the debate centered on Logan and not Barn­well. Was Johnson trying to avoid injuring his friend, or former friend? At any rate he gave way after the assembly agreed to nominate someone else in Logan's place. The victory was assured by a new law, written by Nairne, which guaranteed this right to the assembly. The Assembly of 1707 as a whole was a victory for the opposition who finally pushed through an Indian trade bill and several other important measures. Nairne was also appointed the Indian agent for the province. John, of course, was the comptroller but not for long. In November he petitioned to be relieved of his duties and was replaced by Captain Thomas Walker.
.
This still leaves us in the dark about the riot which John led against the government. It may have occurred in connection with the consequences of the opposition victory. Johnson still smarted over his defeat at the hands of Nairne, and when Nairne, as the Indian agent, charged Johnson's son-in-law, Thomas Broughton, with illegal trade practices, Johnson had him thrown in jail on a trumped up charge of high treason. Sixty-two inhabitants of Colleton county signed a petition to gain his release on the grounds that it was false and that his presence among the Indians was essential to peace, but it was rejected. It seems most likely that it was during this period that John actively and finally threw in his lot with Nairne and the planter position and "took to the streets" by which he finally severed his relations with Trott and left Charles Town to take up permanent residence on Port Royal Island. It is worth noting that he received his last early grant of land in February 1709, and Harleston wrote to Page in March 1709. Harleston may well have exaggerated when he said that it was because of the riot that John "was turned out of all."

John was soon back in Charles Town as a member of the assembly from Colleton county in 1710-11 and from Colleton and the new Granville county in 1711-12 in all of which he was rated as a leader of the first rank in terms of committee assignments and legislation.12 Much of the ill-feeling of the previous years seems to have died down. Sirmans notes that "such stalwarts of the Church party as Thomas Broughton and William Rhett cheerfully worked in the Commons House alongside Thomas Nairne and John Barnwell, dissenting opponents." 13 In fact when the Tuscarora Indians went on the warpath in North Carolina and the local government appealed to South Carolina for help, the assembly appointed John as colonel and commander of the expeditionary force.

John's military experience must have been extensive, but the record is meagre. Since 1701 England had been at war with France and Spain in what in this country is called Queen Anne's War, and the region between Carolina and Florida became a sort of no-man's land. In August 1706 an enemy fleet was turned away from the very gates of Charles Town. When one of their ships stopped in Sewee Bay to raid the country side, a sloop was dispatched under Colonel Rhett to capture it. When they were successful, Rhett sent John Barnwell, who was among the volunteers aboard, to bring the good news to the city.14 John was more heavily involved in the various raiding parties into Flori­da. In 1708 he led a party through Timucua and up the St. John's river.15 On this as on other expeditions, he made maps of whatever he explored from which he made the great mother map of the American southeast from which all subsequent maps of that area were made.16 Now in October 1711 he was given the command of the first Indian war in the history of the Carolinas. 17

The Tuscarora Indians lived in the region between the Cape Fear and Pamlico rivers mainly along the Neuse. One of the strongest and most warlike tribes in North Carolina, their chief, King Hancock, was able to call upon 1,000 warriors from his people. Their fear of the encroaching Europeans was, in this instance, stimulated by Indian traders in Virginia afraid of competition from Carolina and also by rival Indian tribes. The Tuscaroras took advantage of divisions in the local government to make their attack in September 1711, killing or capturing for slavery over 200 settlers. The government was helpless and appealed to Virginia and South Carolina. Virginia failed to respond, but Governor Gibbes and the assembly in Charles Town pledged £4,000 and an army.

Colonel Barnwell's force consisted of 30 militiamen, two other officers: Major Alexander Mackay and Captain John Bull, and about 500 Indians. The Indians, drawn from several small tribes, were, for the most part very unreli­able. The Yemassee company had 158 men of whom only 87 were Yemassees (the only reliable group). The Essaw company had 155 men from seven different tribes, and Captain Bull's company was composed of men from eight more tribes.


References


1 Joseph Walker Barnwell, "Barnwell of South Carolina," The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine (Jan. 1901), Vol. II, pp. 47-50 has the Harleston—Page correspondence.


2 Stephen Bull Barnwell, "The Barnewall Family during the 16th and 17th Centuries," The Irish Genealogist, Vol. 3, Nos. 5-8, 10-11 (1960-63; 1965-66), and "The Family of Barnewall (De Berneval) during the Middle Ages," ibid., No. 4 (1959), pp. 124-135.


3 S. B. Barnwell, op. cit., Vol. 3, No. 6 (1961), pp. 206-209.


4 Marion Eugene Sirmans, Colonial South Carolina. A Political History, 1663-1763 (Chapel Hill, 1966), p. 58. Wooden houses continued to be built, however.


5 Alexander Samuel Salley (ed.), Commissions and Instructions from the Lords Proprietors of Carolina to Public Officials of South Carolina. 1685-1715 (Columbia, 1916), p. 159.


6 J. W. Barnwell, op. cit., p. 47n.


7 A. S. Salley (ed.), Journal of the Commons House of Assembly, /707 (Columbia, 1940), p. 42.


8 J. W. Barnwell, op. cit., p. 47n.


9 A. S. Salley (ed.), Warrants for Lands in South Carolina, 1692-1711 (Columbia, 1915), pp. 196-7.


10 Sirmans, op. cit., p. 81.


11 Loc cit.


12 Jack P. Greene, The Quest for Power: The Lower Houses of Assembly in the Southern Royal Colonies, 1689-1776 (Chapel Hill, 1963), p. 475.


13 Sirmans, op. cit., p. 104.


14 Edward McCrady, History of South Carolina under the Proprietary Government (New York, 1901), pp. 400-1.


15 Verner Winslow Crane, The Southern Frontier, 1670-1732 (Durham, N.C., 1929), p. 220.


16 William P. Cumming, The Southeast in Early Maps (chapel Hill, 1962, 2d ed.), p. 46.


17 Joseph W. Barnwell (ed.), "The Tuscarora Expedition. Letters of Colonel John Barnwell," SCHGM. Vol. IX (1908), pp. 28 54.


18 Ibid., pp. 33-34.


19 Ibid., p. 40.
20I Ibid., p. 44.


21 Ibid., pp. 45-46.


22 Ibid., p. 54.


23 Chapman James Milling, Red Carolinians (Chapel Hill, 1940), p. 128.


24 Crane, op. cit., p. 170.


25 William L. McDowell (ed.), Journals of the Commissioners of the Indian Trade 17/0-1718 (Columbia, 1955), passim.


26 Milling, op. cit. pp. 155-56.


27 Crane, op. cit., p. 228.


28 Ibid., p. 220.


29 Ella Lonn, The Colonial Agents of the Southern Colonies (Chapel Hill, 1945), pp. 280,308.


30 A. S. Salley (ed.), Journal of His Majesty's Colony for South Carolina May 29, 1721-June 10,1721 (Columbia, 1930), pp. 13-25.


31 J. W. Barnwell (ed.), "Fort King George. Journal of Col. John Barnwell (Tuscarora) in the Construction of the Fort on the Altamaha in 1721," SCHGM (1926), Vol. XXVII, No. 4, pp. 189-203.


32 Crane, op. cit., pp. 236-37.


33 Salley, op. cit.,JCHA,June 2-16,1724, p. 17.



Continued Next Post….

Roger de Barneval and the First Crusade


In the mid 1000s the Muslim Seldjuk Turks had gained power and territory in the Middle East. Byzantine Emperor Alexius sent a delegation to Pope Urban II asking for him to call a crusade to help and to free the city of Jerusalem.


Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont on November 27, 1095 called for a "Holy War".


This declaration created a great response among the youth of Western Europe. Two brothers, Hugh and Roger de Barneval, were among the first to join and wear the "sacred cross". No record beyond this is made of Hugh.


They joined the Crusade of Robert II, Duke of Normandy, the eldest son of William the Conqueror, and set off for Rome in September 1096 with a large well resourced army with large contingents of Knights from Normandy, Bretagne, and England. They spent the winter in Puglia and arrived in Constantinople in the spring of 1097. They spent two weeks in Constantinople and paid homage to Emperor Alexius.


The first target for this expedition was Nicaea, the capital of Roum (Turkey).  The monks reported that Roger de Barneville, Duke Robert, Ralph de Guader, and Conan, Earl of Brittany, took their station, with the Counts of Vermandois, Chartres, Flanders, and Toulouse. 


Nicaea fell to the crusaders on June 20. 1097 with Roger celebrated for his bravery and exploits by the accompanying monks who recorded all events.




The crusade then marched on and conquered Antioch with de Barneville again celebrated for his bravery. They had occupied Antioch for only two days when they were attacked by a force from the Sultan of Persia.


As this army approached the walls of Antioch, de Barneville leading a force of 15 knights rode out to the attack. At first the Turks scattered, but the force soon found themselves surrounded. They almost made it back to the City and were in sight of the walls when a Turkish arrow killed him.




The Muslims beheaded him and rode around in triumph with the head on the end of a spear. His compatriots later revenged him with the heads of six Saracens mounted on spears and recovered his body.




He was magnificently interred in the Church of Saint Peter the Apostle in a ceremony attended by all the Christian Princes.





Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Translation: I would rather die than be dishonored


My mother's family are the Barnwells. They had quite an impact on Low Country Carolina and Georgia. It is my pleasure to share some of the family history of that family and others in my bloodline with anybody interested.

Colonel John Barnwell


The first, and founder of our line, was John "Tuscarora Jack" Barnwell who landed in Charles Town in the Colony of Carolina from Dublin, Ireland in 1701. 

Known as the Barnewalls in Ireland the family had a rich heritage. They came originally from Normandy where they were known as De Berneval. 

The first in our Barnwell line to arrive in England was Alanus De Berneval the First who fought alongside William the Conqueror at the battle of Hastings in 1066. 


A later Alanus De Berneval sailed with Richard De Clare (Strongbow) in his conquest of Ireland in 1172, landing at Bannow Bay in Wexford. 

By 1215 we see Hugh de Berneval granted the lands of Terenure and Drimnagh, and also a sizable dowry, by King John.  


Hugh built a castle at Drimnagh and this is where the De Berneval family were in residence for more then 400 years.
  

The Barnewall's (name was anglicized from De Berneval) were not just owners of the lands at Drimnagh, as they had lands and fortified castles all over Ireland.  

They were involved in many events in Irish history and held positions in Irish Parliament  and in the military campaigns against the Irish. 

John's grandfather Richard was a merchant, but he had been an Alderman of Dublin, and briefly the Lord Mayor. He also held Archerstown, an estate in County Meath which was granted to him by the king for his loyalty during the Irish Rebellion of 1641. 

John's parents were Matthew Barnewall and Margaret Carberry, daughter of Alderman John Carberry. 

Matthew, also an alderman of Dublin, was killed in the Siege of Derry, where he was a captain in King James Irish Army, on August 12, 1690. The siege ended the attempt to restore the last Stuart king after the revolution of 1688. 

The family seat, Archerstown in County Meath, was forfeited as a result of this support of James II against William and Mary. History reports that after losing the 17th Century fight for Irish Independence, a steady stream of Irishmen who came to be known as the "Wild Geese" took flight for the Continent. 

John, instead came to the Colonies.